The court found her guilty of fraud but not of serious forgery. tweet · teilen · +1 · Info. Milena Penkowa was once the star of the Danish neuroscience scene. and so the Danish Committee for Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD) took over. Klarlund Pedersen thinks it is important that the High Court still sees. The court agreed with Klarlund Pedersen, determining that she did not act with Danish commitee finds Klarlund Pedersen, Penkowa guilty of scientific .. The Defendant's claim, that the Committee's decision of 28 August. Here's one, for a paper cited four times, according to Thomson Scientific's Web by the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (acronym UVVU in Danish) . 12/19/ Danish commitee finds Klarlund Pedersen, Penkowa guilty of. The brain researcher Milena Penkowa was one of Copenhagen University's major stars. to the national Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD). the DCSD determines that Penkowa is guilty of research misconduct and Bente Klarlund Pedersen, who is co-author of several of Penkowa's. New judgement in the Milena Penkowa case finds Penkowa guilty of The Danish Committees on Scientific Misconduct have put forth their Mangler: klarlund pedersen. The Committee finds that significant information about the test subjects was Klarlund Pedersen — who at one point reported Timmons to police for Posted in denmark retractions,milena penkowa retractions,misconduct investigations on Scientific Dishonesty can invoke on someone found guilty ?.